anbei ein Auszug aus dem E-Mail Header. Vielleicht macht es die Problematik deutlicher.
Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0
Received: from mail01.dlv.de ([192.168.10.11]) by mail02.dlv.de with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211);
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:36:44 +0100
Received: from esec400.dlv.intern ([192.168.10.41]) by mail01.dlv.de with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2499);
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:37:05 +0100
Received: from web01.repro-mayr.de ([194.97.59.229])
by esec400.dlv.intern (mail01.dlv.de)
with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:57:29 +0100
Received: from web01.repro-mayr.de (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by web01.repro-mayr.de (8.14.3/8.13.4) with ESMTP id n1O8vc2f023856
for <frank>; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:57:38 +0100
Received: (from apache@localhost)
by web01.repro-mayr.de (8.14.3/8.14.2/Submit) id n1O8vcII023854;
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:57:38 +0100
To:
frank.jasper@dlv.de
Subject: [Junk released by User action] Testnewsletter
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: \"Frank Jasper\" <frank>
Reply-To: <frank>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:57:37 +0100
Message-ID: <fe98daacfc4c985ba536d018ffc6efb1>
Status: N
X-SWM-BOUNCE: 11_02_04_01
Content-Type: multipart/related;
boundary=\"----=_NextPart_000_545D_5094D50A.50A47758\"
X-Mlf-Threat: likelyspam
X-Mlf-Threat-Detailed: likelyspam;collab_embeddedimage;-;community_mlf_collab__a1.E1=f6j4mhrIDMjkvobYn25AfEXc9gP
X-Mlf-UniqueId: i200902240857290071951
X-Mlf-Communication-Key: aeaa-edef-aaab-fbao-aebo-cpbh; disposition=internal
Return-Path:
apache@web01.repro-mayr.de
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Feb 2009 13:37:05.0342 (UTC) FILETIME=[25C105E0:01C9974E]
Hier steht als Return-Path der Apache Server drin.